Luang Pu Thong Dam of Wat Tha Thong: A Century-Old Abbot and the BE 2529 Portrait Series

Luang Pu Thong Dam Thitawanno (หลวงปู่ทองดำ ฐิตวัณโณ), whose ecclesiastical title was Phra Nimmanakowit (พระนิมมานโกวิท), is one of the best-remembered senior monks of Wat Tha Thong in Uttaradit. Thai commemorative writing often calls him a “monk of five reigns,” meaning that his life extended from the reign of Rama V into that of Rama IX. It is a historical description, not a formal Buddhist rank.

The temple and province are essential identifiers. A different modern monk in Lopburi, attached to Wat Tham Tapian Thong, is also marketed in Chinese as Lung Por Thong Dam. This profile concerns the monk who served Wat Tha Thong in Uttaradit for decades and died in BE 2548.

From Phichit to Uttaradit

The most detailed published biographies give 15 March BE 2441 as his birth date. They place his birth at Ban Sai Rong Khon in Taphan Hin District, Phichit, and name his parents as Bunnak and Chai Menphring. At the age of twenty-two, in BE 2463, he was ordained at Wat Wang Mu in Uttaradit and received the monastic name Thitawanno.

The sequence of his early studies is preserved mainly in later biography. The fullest version says that he spent one rains retreat at Wat Tha Thong, then moved to Wat Tha Thanon to study the Vinaya and monastic curriculum. It records that he passed the elementary Nak Tham examination in BE 2466. In BE 2468 the Wat Tha Thong community and local Sangha invited him back to assume responsibility for the monastery. A local curriculum issued by the Uttaradit education authority also places the start of his abbacy in BE 2468, making this one of the firmer dates in the account.

His later offices are more consistently reported. He received the ecclesiastical title Phra Nimmanakowit in BE 2504, was appointed to a district Sangha leadership position in BE 2510, and became an adviser in BE 2542. These roles show that he was not merely a ritual master remembered by collectors; he also carried long-term responsibility for monastic administration, education, and local religious life.

A long stewardship of Wat Tha Thong

Wat Tha Thong stands in Wang Kaphi Subdistrict, Mueang Uttaradit, near the Nan River. A compiled temple history records an ordination hall, preaching hall, chanting hall, monks’ residences, and a government primary school on temple grounds. Later biography associates the expansion of temple land, rebuilding of religious structures, monastic education, and meditation facilities with Thong Dam’s decades as abbot.

The evidence needs to be read at the correct level. The buildings and school are supported by temple and education records, but surviving public sources do not provide a complete project file naming the initiator, donor, builder, and completion date for every structure. It is therefore more accurate to say that Thong Dam led and sustained the temple’s development over a very long tenure than to credit every building to him alone.

Local memory portrays him as accessible to ordinary villagers. A first-person memoir by a long-time visitor describes him accepting invitations without concern for status or transport, even when collected in a farm vehicle. A study of local traditional medicine also presents him as an important memory behind later community care and herbal practice. These accounts are not clinical evidence, but they show the monastery’s wider rural role as a place of religion, education, care, and mediation.

The Luang Pho Ngern lineage story

The best-known lineage story says that, as a young child, Thong Dam was taken to Wat Bang Khlan in Phichit and accepted as an adopted son by Luang Pho Ngern Phutthachot, who taught him chants and sacred knowledge. Some versions add that the boy displayed exceptional memory. The story appears repeatedly in temple commemorations, newspapers, and collector literature and has become an important part of local religious memory.

No contemporary adoption document, temple register, or matching primary record from the Luang Pho Ngern side has yet been located in the public sources reviewed for this profile. It should therefore be presented as lineage tradition rather than uncontested monastic fact. A memoir closer to personal testimony instead says that, at about ten, Thong Dam studied with Luang Pu Tim of Wat Klang in Uttaradit and sometimes accompanied him to visit Luang Pho Ngern. The two versions may preserve different retellings of the same memory, but they cannot safely be fused without primary documentation.

The late-BE 2512 clay amulets and the “earthquake Somdej”

Before the formally authorised portrait issue of BE 2529, collectors particularly valued a group of clay amulets said to have begun late in BE 2512. Reported forms include large and small Somdej tablets, Khun Phaen, seated Buddha, Phra Rod, Luang Pu Thuat, and walking-Buddha types. A memoir from a visitor close to the temple says the clay was gathered beneath principal Buddha images at nine old or abandoned monasteries around Uttaradit and mixed with Nam Phi iron. Monks and novices reportedly helped press and fire the tablets in alms bowls, and many received a red shellac coating.

These objects are often called the “earthquake Somdej.” Tradition says an earthquake occurred while Thong Dam was consecrating them in the ordination hall, and that some were later included in the BE 2513 consecration for the first Phraya Phichai Dap Hak medal. There is no complete temple production ledger establishing the earthquake story, every mould, or the proportions of nine-temple earth and Nam Phi iron. Those phrases are important collector labels, not visual tests that can authenticate an individual tablet by themselves.

The first portrait series of BE 2529

Thong Dam’s most clearly classified sacred objects are the portrait pieces first formally authorised in BE 2529. Collector accounts say he had repeatedly declined proposals to reproduce his likeness. After the Uttaradit prison produced a powder-amulet group in BE 2528 that included his portrait and asked him to consecrate it, disciples sought permission again and received approval for an official first series.

The series included larger devotional statues, small seated metal figures, and an oval medal. On the medal’s obverse, Thong Dam sits cross-legged amid inscriptions naming Phra Nimmanakowit, Wat Tha Thong, Uttaradit, the year, and his age; the reverse carries a yantra inside a square frame. Reported materials include gold, silver, and copper, while the small cast figures also appear in nawa alloy. Collector catalogues give production totals for each material, but the figures come from retrospective articles rather than a publicly available temple mint ledger. Boxes, numbering, early photographs, and ownership history still matter when assessing a particular piece.

An official Uttaradit public-relations report on the BE 2568 provincial amulet competition lists Thong Dam’s first BE 2529 cast figure among recognised local-master categories. This supports the series’ established place in local collecting, but the existence of a competition category does not authenticate every similar-looking object.

Identification begins with name, period, and manufacture

Research should proceed in three layers. First, establish the person: appropriate Thai inscriptions may include Thong Dam, Phra Nimmanakowit, Wat Tha Thong, or Uttaradit. A Chinese market name alone is insufficient because it overlaps with another monk. Second, establish the series: the late-BE 2512 clay tablets, the BE 2529 first portrait medal and cast figures, and later commemorative issues were made by different processes and should not be judged by one checklist. Third, examine the object: lettering, portrait contour, yantra position, rim and loop, casting or striking marks, natural surface change, and provenance.

For clay tablets, attraction to a magnet can only suggest iron content. It cannot prove Nam Phi iron or authenticate the tablet. Red coatings, old-looking cracks, and dirt can be imitated. For BE 2529 metal pieces, weight, dimensions, alloy, die details, and edge characteristics should be compared with well-provenanced examples of the same type and material. Claims of supernatural efficacy cannot replace clear front, back, and edge photographs or traceable ownership evidence.

Death date and inconsistent anniversary counts

Multiple sources place Thong Dam’s death on the evening of 25 August BE 2548 and give his age as 107 years, five months, and twenty days, with eighty-six rains retreats. That calculation agrees with the detailed birth date of 15 March BE 2441. Some recent commemorative reports, however, called BE 2565 his 121st birth anniversary and BE 2567 his 123rd, implying a BE 2444 birth. Those counts conflict with both the detailed date and the reported age at death.

The discrepancy should not be silently harmonised. This profile uses BE 2441 as the principal date because it is the fuller account and can be checked against the stated lifespan, while recording that modern anniversary numbering has not been consistent. A monastic register, civil birth record, or formal obituary would be needed to settle the issue more firmly. After his death, a four-sided pavilion was built to enshrine his body, and annual memorial rites, alms offerings, communal meals, and charitable activities continue to keep his memory present beyond the amulet market.

A connection with life today

Thong Dam’s legacy is larger than claims about occult power or a high-priced series. His long life was invested in one local monastery: studying discipline, guiding the Sangha, developing temple work, responding to villagers, and showing restraint about the commercial use of his own image. To collect his sacred objects only for promised effects is to miss much of that history.

In a market crowded with shared names, copied dates, and uncertain objects, the most useful discipline is patience: identify the person, temple, period, and object in that order; respect faith, but also respect evidence. That patience offers collectors more protection than any guarantee and comes closer to the ethical memory of a local elder.

Sources

Saving, comments and Community Review need an approved community membership. Reading does not. Apply as a reader